NYCDEP Reassesses Its Nitrogen Management Program
by Alfonso Lopez and Diane Hammerman
The New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP) owns and operates 14 wastewater treatment plants in New York City. Five of these plants are in the process of being upgraded to provide for nitrogen removal. These plants include the four Upper East River (UER) water pollution control plants (WPCP), Wards Island, Hunts Point, Tallman Island, and Bowery Bay and the 26th Ward plant in Jamaica Bay. These five plants will undergo major reconstruction and be upgraded to step-feed biological nutrient removal (BNR) to achieve compliance with a Nitrogen Administrative Consent Order relative to nutrient removals pursuant to Long Island Sound Study goals.
The NYCDEP originally planned to upgrade all five plants according to "full" step-feed BNR designs. This program provided for extensive instrumentation and controls, and was based on very conservative parameters including: aeration design based on a peak-day load, not taking credit for denitrification, allowing for 100 percent return activated sludge (RAS), and no credit for primary settling tank removals.
In a re-examination of the basis of planning for the long range Nitrogen Management Program, the NYCDEP identified that the inherent conservatism used to develop the detailed full step-feed BNR resulted in a capital-intensive program which contributed to a cost escalation in excess of $500 million, raising the total cost of the upgrades to $3.9 billion with $1.3 billion for the BNR portion alone. A reassessment showed that a modified step-feed BNR process configuration could allow New York City to achieve the goals and limits of the consent order within the set time frames at a reduced cost, without materially changing the technological backbone on which the program was based.
The conservatism manifested itself in the design approach toward sizing and redundancy of process equipment for systems such as the return activated sludge, waste activated sludge, flow split, air supply, etc. This conservatism has now been reduced. And, in order to distinguish the more efficient design from the earlier approach, it has been identified in design guidance documents as the "advanced basic" step BNR process configuration.
Table 1 provides a comparison of full step BNR to the advanced basic step BNR process.
While reassessing the planning baseline, parallel research has developed increased confidence in separate centrate treatment both with respect to performance and to providing options for reliable operating modes.
The current nitrogen management program incorporates a revised planning criteria and the increased operating flexibility and reliability introduced by the separate centrate treatment process option. The operating modes at each facility will be determined on a plant specific basis, and seasonal process modifications will also be possible. Table 2 presents the current plan for plant process configurations for New York City's Upper East River (UER) WPCPs based on detailed analysis and performance projections.
Analysis of the updated plan as presented in Table 2 indicates that the projected performance capability of the process configuration is expected to achieve compliance with the Nitrogen Administrative Consent Order limits by the scheduled end dates. Like the original full step BNR plan, preliminary modeling results for the advanced step BNR configuration indicate that the NYCDEP will be able to achieve yet further removals with the addition of carbon.
"The NYCDEP hopes to identify and implement additional strategies to provide the most cost-effective and environmentally sound solutions."
The NYCDEP will also continue to examine emerging and innovative technologies in the industry and to test some technologies previously examined. By examining innovative technologies, the NYCDEP hopes to identify and implement additional strategies to provide the most cost-effective and environmentally sound solutions for further enhancement of water quality.
Step-feed BNR with biological treatment of centrate will continue as the backbone of the program, but the range of possible enhancement strategies has not as yet been fully evaluated. One example of the innovative technologies that the NYCDEP currently plans to evaluate on a demonstration scale is the SHARON Process at Wards Island. This is an innovative yet proven separate centrate treatment process utilized for a number of years in the Netherlands. This technology was originally brought to the NYCDEP's attention by the Nitrogen Technical Advisory Committee (NTAC), a group of preeminent scholars and researchers. The NYCDEP will continue to work with NTAC to identify a comprehensive range of innovative technologies or approaches to enhance nitrogen reductions beyond those required by the consent order.
Table 1. Summary of the components of full step BNR and advanced basic step BNR
| Full Step-Feed BNR | Advanced Basic Step BNR |
| Install baffles and mixers | Install baffles and mixers |
| Flow control to each pass | Flow balancing |
| Automated aeration system
with dissolved oxygen control |
Aeration balancing with
dissolved oxygen optimization |
| Process air blowers for 100%
nitrification of maximum day
influent total nitrogen load (N + 2) |
Process air blowers based on
existing footprint, credit for
denitrification, assimilation,
primary settling tank
attenuation, and refractory
total nitrogen |
| 2 switch zones and
1 pre-anoxic zone per pass |
1 or 2 switch zones and
1 pre-anoxic per pass |
| RAS system for 100% design dry
weather flow (N + 2) |
RAS system based on existing
footprint and solids flux
analysis/modeling results |
| Settled/unsettled centrate
to pass "A" for WPCPs with
dewatering facilities |
Separate centrate treatment in
existing aeration tanks
(except Tallman Island) |
| Froth control systems
(hoods, surface wasting,
RAS chlorination) |
Froth control systems
(hoods, surface wasting,
RAS chlorination) |
Table 2. UER WPCP step-feed BNR with biological treatment of centrate configurations
| Water Pollution
Control Plants |
Step BNR Upgrade
Configuration |
Centrate Treatment Options |
| Selected Centrate
Treatment Mode |
Process Options |
| Hunts
Point |
Full step BNR |
Centrate to
pass "A" |
Separate centrate
treatment |
| Wards
Island |
Advanced basic
step BNR |
Separate centrate
treatment in two
existing aeration
tanks |
Centrate to pass "A" |
| Bowery
Bay |
Advanced basic
step BNR |
Separate centrate
treatment in an
existing aeration
tank |
Centrate to pass "A" |
| Tallman
Island |
Advanced basic
step BNR |
Centrate to pass "A" |
|
Alfonso R. Lopez was appointed deputy commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Wastewater Treatment in March 2001. Mr. Lopez is a graduate of New York University with a degree in civil engineering. He has been a licensed professional engineer in New York State since 1978 and also holds a New York State wastewater treatment plant operator's certification.
Diane A. Hammerman received a bachelor of science in applied physics from Columbia University in 1992 and a master of science in environmental engineering from Polytechnic University in 2000. Ms. Hammerman is a licensed professional engineer in the state of New York. Hired in 1993 to staff the NYCDEP's Industrial Pretreatment Program, she is now the division chief of operations support.
—Alfonso Lopez and Diane Hammerman